“What does it mean
when people applaud? Should I give 'em money? Say thank you? Lift my
dress? The lack of applause - that I can respond to.” Barbara Streisand
Beyond my chosen calling of "word of mouth", I find no other anthropological study so interesting than "why people applaud?".
Watching The Rockettes and The Nutcracker at different venues over the last two weekend was a testament to the "cause and effect" of applause.
I was also listening to a CBC radio program this weekend that dove deep into the subject, learning in many respects - we applaud for many the same reasons we "word of mouth" - both are highly refined social grooming skills and each performance art has their masters.
Many years ago at P&G, some brash colleagues and myself caught onto the "groupclap effect" and would play on the whims of our corporate auditorium audience by timing our clapping to produce a bigger or smaller result. Much like word of mouth, it is amazing to find out how few people you require to produce a deafening sound or disrupt applause into a murmur.
So what's in common with applause and word of mouth?
- we do both to show appreciation
- we do both to help the performer or recipient
- we do both do be civil and to share a common bond with other humans
- we do both to share our mutual interests
- we do both to validate our understanding
- we do both to provoke a reaction
- we do both in an attempt to synchronize with others
- we do both to influence a better result
There is also a negative side to both:
- we do both to show cynicism - think about the waitress who drops a plate in a restaurant
- we do both to mock others - the thudding sound of one person clapping mockingly is sometimes worse than silence
The conclusion - word of mouth and applause is instinctive human nature that is understood and harnessed by a wonderful few. Many politicians are great at orchestrating the latter, only some are good at harnessing the former.
If I was back at university, I would love to do a thesis on this subject and analyze some of the unusual and changing characteristics of applause:
- is a show funnier when you add studio applause?
- do people enjoy something more when there is bigger applause?
- what is the most influential and best timed applause - delayed, isolated, provoked
- do we try to synchronize applause?
- why do people applaud in movies when there are no performers there to receive it?
- what is the effect of funneling "extra" applause into a speaker system?
- what types of people applaud louder?
- why don't we applaud planes landing successfully anymore?
- how many rounds of applause is optimal?
- how do speakers maintain applause?
- why do we feel compelled to applaud even poor or unsuccessful performance?
- what's the psychology behind "applause for a musical encore"?
- what's the trigger that moves "applause" to "standing applause"?
Any or your own thoughts and insights on applause.
Beyond my chosen calling of "word of mouth", I find no other anthropological study so interesting than "why people applaud?".
Watching The Rockettes and The Nutcracker at different venues over the last two weekend was a testament to the "cause and effect" of applause.
I was also listening to a CBC radio program this weekend that dove deep into the subject, learning in many respects - we applaud for many the same reasons we "word of mouth" - both are highly refined social grooming skills and each performance art has their masters.
Many years ago at P&G, some brash colleagues and myself caught onto the "groupclap effect" and would play on the whims of our corporate auditorium audience by timing our clapping to produce a bigger or smaller result. Much like word of mouth, it is amazing to find out how few people you require to produce a deafening sound or disrupt applause into a murmur.
So what's in common with applause and word of mouth?
- we do both to show appreciation
- we do both to help the performer or recipient
- we do both do be civil and to share a common bond with other humans
- we do both to share our mutual interests
- we do both to validate our understanding
- we do both to provoke a reaction
- we do both in an attempt to synchronize with others
- we do both to influence a better result
There is also a negative side to both:
- we do both to show cynicism - think about the waitress who drops a plate in a restaurant
- we do both to mock others - the thudding sound of one person clapping mockingly is sometimes worse than silence
The conclusion - word of mouth and applause is instinctive human nature that is understood and harnessed by a wonderful few. Many politicians are great at orchestrating the latter, only some are good at harnessing the former.
If I was back at university, I would love to do a thesis on this subject and analyze some of the unusual and changing characteristics of applause:
- is a show funnier when you add studio applause?
- do people enjoy something more when there is bigger applause?
- what is the most influential and best timed applause - delayed, isolated, provoked
- do we try to synchronize applause?
- why do people applaud in movies when there are no performers there to receive it?
- what is the effect of funneling "extra" applause into a speaker system?
- what types of people applaud louder?
- why don't we applaud planes landing successfully anymore?
- how many rounds of applause is optimal?
- how do speakers maintain applause?
- why do we feel compelled to applaud even poor or unsuccessful performance?
- what's the psychology behind "applause for a musical encore"?
- what's the trigger that moves "applause" to "standing applause"?
Any or your own thoughts and insights on applause.
Social Media Zealots
Problogger
Conversational Media Marketing
Greg Verdino
Altitude Branding
The Buzz Bin
Being Peter Kim
The Altimeter
CoBrandit
Web-Strategist
Groundswell